Is it should have or should had?
Had is the past tense of have and has, however, we don’t use ‘should has’ even for ‘she’.
For example, she would have…
(NOT she would has).
Thus, always use ‘should have’..
Should have had meaning?
Should have + past participle. 1: Should have + past participle can mean something that would have been a good idea, but that you didn’t do it. It’s like giving advice about the past when you say it to someone else, or regretting what you did or didn’t do when you’re talking about yourself.
Where we use have had?
Had had is the past perfect form of have when it is used as a main verb to describe our experiences and actions. We use the past perfect when we are talking about the past and want to refer back to an earlier past time, Madiini.
Have been or had been?
“Has been” is used in the third-person singular and “have been” is used for first- and second-person singular and all plural uses. … “Had been” is the past perfect tense and is used in all cases, singular and plural.
Is had of correct?
Yes, it is correct. As mentioned in other answers, the first ‘had’ is the simple past tense of ‘have’. Ex. He ‘had’ his breakfast.
Is could of ever correct?
When to Use Could Of Could of is a common misspelling of the verb phrase could have. Most native English speakers use the contraction could’ve in everyday speech. This pronunciation omits the stressed H sound that differentiates have from of in the slurred familiarity of spoken English.
Is would have had correct grammar?
Another Third Conditional Tense: “Would have had” “Would have had” – “Would have,” along with the past participle, “had,” can but used in situations expressing something that must have happened, but didn’t because conditions were different.
Should have had in a sentence?
I should have had breakfast before I left home because food is so expensive at the airport. I should have taken their advice about the thickness of the roofing felt. He should have all that he needs in the two suitcases. She should have had all her jewellery on her person.
Is could of wrong?
Because have (or the contraction form) sounds like of when spoken quickly, it’s common for writers to use the word of instead of have or its contraction. But it’s grammatically incorrect to use the could of/would of/should of construction. Never, ever write could of, would of, or should of.
Is had had correct?
It is correct, though it too might seem a bit awkward. To understand “had had,” we need to take a look at the present perfect and past perfect tenses. … Present perfect tense uses “has” and “have” plus the past participle, as in “have had” and “has gone.” Now let’s put the chocolate sentence in the past tense.
Could would Should grammar?
‘Should’, ‘would’ and ‘could’ are auxiliary verbs that can sometimes get confusing. They are the past tense of ‘shall’, ‘will’ and ‘can’ but are also used in other situations.